Evaluation of A Sludge Management Monitoring System for Sustainable Waste Disposal

Authors

  • NOBIL A. BATIANCILA, M.E., Ph.D. Cebu Technological University Author
  • REDJIE D. ARCADIO, Ph.D., DPA Cebu Technological University Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.65150/EP-gjetr/V2E8/2026-04

Keywords:

Sludge Management, Wastewater Treatment, Digital Monitoring, Technology Management, Operational Efficiency, Environmental Compliance, Sustainability

Abstract

The increasing generation of sludge from wastewater treatment facilities creates environmental, operational, and regulatory challenges, particularly when monitoring and disposal rely on manual procedures. This study developed and evaluated a sludge management monitoring system designed to improve sludge tracking, operational efficiency, documentation, and environmental compliance. A descriptive-evaluative and correlational design was used with 200 personnel from five commissaries in the Philippines. Data were gathered through a validated questionnaire and analyzed using frequency, percentage, mean, standard deviation, and Pearson correlation. Results indicated that the system received very high ratings in usefulness, ease of use, relevance, technical requirements, effectiveness, and acceptability. The system improved sludge tracking, workflow efficiency, documentation, and environmental compliance while reducing manual errors and delays. Findings also indicated potential for the beneficial reuse of properly treated sludge as a soil additive, subject to applicable safety and environmental requirements. Overall, the system provided an effective and user-friendly technology-based approach for sustainable sludge management.

References

1) Anastas, P. T., & Zimmerman, J. B. (2003). Design through the 12 principles of green engineering. Environmental Science & Technology, 37(5), 94A–101A. https://doi.org/10.1021/es032373g

2) Creswell, J. W. (2014). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (4th ed.). SAGE Publications.

3) Creswell, J. W., & Creswell, J. D. (2018). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (5th ed.). SAGE Publications.

4) Davis, F. D. (1989). Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Quarterly, 13(3), 319–340.

5) DeLone, W. H., & McLean, E. R. (2003). The DeLone and McLean model of information systems success: A ten-year update. Journal of Management Information Systems, 19(4), 9–30. https://doi.org/10.1080/07421222.2003.11045748

6) Department of Environment and Natural Resources. (2016). Administrative Order No. 2016-08: Water quality guidelines and general effluent standards of 2016. Department of Environment and Natural Resources, Republic of the Philippines.

7) Di Giacomo, M., & Romano, P. (2022). Circular economy and sustainable wastewater sludge management: Resource recovery and environmental considerations. Journal of Environmental Management.

8) Di Iaconi, C., De Sanctis, M., & Ramadori, R. (2017). Sustainable approaches to wastewater and sludge management. Environmental Science and Pollution Research.

9) Field, A. (2018). Discovering statistics using IBM SPSS statistics (5th ed.). SAGE Publications.

10) Grosser, A., & Neczaj, E. (2018). Sewage sludge management and resource recovery: Current challenges and opportunities. Environmental Science and Pollution Research.

11) Hair, J. F., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J., & Anderson, R. E. (2019). Multivariate data analysis (8th ed.). Cengage.

12) Kumar, et al. (2018). [Complete title and publication details should be verified from the original source cited in the manuscript].

13) Kumar, et al. (2020). [Complete title and publication details should be verified from the original source cited in the manuscript].

14) Lopez, & Hernandez. (2017). [Complete title and publication details should be verified from the original source cited in the manuscript].

15) Molinos-Senante, M., Hernández-Sancho, F., & Sala-Garrido, R. (2016). Economic and environmental performance of wastewater treatment plants: A systematic assessment. Journal of Environmental Management.

16) Nopens, I., et al. (2020). [Complete title and publication details should be verified from the original source cited in the manuscript].

17) Raheem, A., Sikarwar, V. S., He, J., Dastyar, W., Dionysiou, D. D., Wang, W., & Zhao, M. (2018). Opportunities and challenges in sustainable treatment and resource recovery from sewage sludge. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 82, 3301–3318.

18) Richey, R. C., & Klein, J. D. (2014). Design and development research: Methods, strategies, and issues. Routledge.

19) Rogers, E. M. (2003). Diffusion of innovations (5th ed.). Free Press.

20) Saunders, M., Lewis, P., & Thornhill, A. (2019). Research methods for business students (8th ed.). Pearson.

21) Singh, & Sharma. (2019). [Complete title and publication details should be verified from the original source cited in the manuscript].

22) Smith, & Garcia. (2016). [Complete title and publication details should be verified from the original source cited in the manuscript].

23) Touloupi, E., et al. (2022). [Complete title and publication details should be verified from the original source cited in the manuscript].

24) United Nations Environment Programme. (2021). [Relevant report on wastewater, sanitation, resource recovery, or sustainable waste management]. United Nations Environment Programme.

25) Venkatesh, V., & Bala, H. (2008). Technology acceptance model 3 and a research agenda on interventions. Decision Sciences, 39(2), 273–315.

26) Waltham, N. J., & Örmeci, B. (2020). [Complete title and publication details should be verified from the original source cited in the manuscript].

27) World Health Organization. (2023). [Relevant report on wastewater, sanitation, sludge, or environmental health]. World Health Organization.

28) World Health Organization. (2026). [Relevant current report on sanitation, wastewater, or environmental health]. World Health Organization.

29) Philippine Laws and Government Issuances

30) Department of Environment and Natural Resources. (2016). DENR Administrative Order No. 2016-08: Water quality guidelines and general effluent standards of 2016. Republic of the Philippines.

31) Republic Act No. 9003. (2001). Ecological Solid Waste Management Act of 2000. Official Gazette of the Republic of the Philippines.

32) Republic Act No. 9275. (2004). Philippine Clean Water Act of 2004. Official Gazette of the Republic of the Philippines.

33) Republic Act No. 11038. (2018). Expanded National Integrated Protected Areas System Act of 2018. Official Gazette of the Republic of the Philippines.

34) Republic Act No. 11898. (2022). Extended Producer Responsibility Act of 2022. Official Gazette of the Republic of the Philippines.

35) Presidential Decree No. 1586. (1978). Establishing an environmental impact statement system, including other environmental management-related measures. Official Gazette of the Republic of the Philippines.

Downloads

Published

2026-08-21

How to Cite

BATIANCILA, N. A., & ARCADIO, R. D. (2026). Evaluation of A Sludge Management Monitoring System for Sustainable Waste Disposal. Global Journal of Engineering and Technology Research, 2(08), 351-359. https://doi.org/10.65150/EP-gjetr/V2E8/2026-04

Most read articles by the same author(s)